How Effective is Online Learning in Michigan

Let's be honest: Online learning in Michigan, as a whole, is in deep need of reform. Since 2010, the average pass rate for online courses in Michigan has hovered around 60 percent. Compared to the pass rate for traditional classrooms, this statistic has led some to condemn virtual schooling as a failed experiment.

This article is a modified version of a blog post of the same name posted by the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute.

Let’s be honest. Online learning in Michigan, as a whole, is in deep need of reform.

Since 2010, the average pass rate for online courses in Michigan has hovered around 60 percent. Compared to the pass rate for traditional classrooms, this statistic has led some to condemn virtual schooling as a failed experiment.

We know from a wealth of research that online learning — when implemented properly — can be used to further the bounds of student learning.

Current data on student success in online learning does not live up to the promise we see exhibited in our research. Our latest report estimates the statewide virtual pass rate at roughly 55 percent.

Statewide Virtual Pass Rate is 55%

In the past decade, we’ve seen the number of virtual learners in Michigan nearly triple. Despite the rapidly growing numbers of online learners, the statewide virtual pass rate has not improved. Quite the opposite, this number has steadily decreased from 66 percent in 2010-11 to 55 percent this past academic year.

Clearly, the inverse relationship between the number of and the success of online learners in our state presents a problem that needs to be addressed.

This is not to say there’s not success when it comes to online learning. This year, our online courses had an overall pass rate of 81 percent. That’s over 25 percentage points higher than the statewide virtual pass rate.

But the question we ask ourselves every year is:

What can we do better to improve the effectiveness of our state’s online learning efforts as a whole?

That’s why the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute conducts annual reviews of the effectiveness of online learning in our state. Their goal is to diagnose what’s going on in Michigan’s virtual classrooms —  analyzing which strategies are effective and which areas need improvement — so we can ultimately provide our students with the digital learning experiences they need to succeed.

In this article, we provide a visual overview of the Michigan’s K-12 Virtual Learning Effectiveness Report, 2016-17The findings from this report offer an illuminating picture of what works well and what does not work well when it comes to online learning in our state.

Who’s taking online courses?

To begin, let’s examine who’s enrolling in our state’s online courses. This past year, 7 percent of Michigan students took at least one virtual course, with over 100,000 students enrolling in a total of more than half a million online courses.

101,359 K-12 students took at least 1 virtual class = 7% of Michigan public school students. 517,470 virtual enrollments were taken by K-12 students

The majority of Michigan school districts had students enrolled in online courses. Last year, two-thirds of the districts in our state reported having at least one virtual enrollment. In total, this means over 1,000 Michigan schools had virtual learners.

2/3 of school districts reported at least one virtual enrollment. 1,102 schools had virtual learners. 56% of these schools had 100 or more virtual enrollments. Schools with 100 or more virtual enrollments accounted for 97% of the enrollments.

The bulk of these enrollments are coming from schools with at-scale online programs. What we’re seeing is that schools with 100 or more virtual enrollments accounted for 97 percent of the half a million total enrollments in our state. It’s typical for schools to either rely heavily on online programs to meet students needs or to rarely use online learning at all.

Virtual Enrollments By Grade Level

Though students from grades K-12 enrolled in online courses, the vast majority of online enrollments (79 percent) came from high school students. Last year, high school seniors alone accounted for over one-quarter (27 percent) of total virtual enrollments.

79% of virtual enrollments came from high schools

Virtual Enrollments By Subject

Breaking the data down by subject, we saw the majority of online courses (67 percent) taken in core subject areas.

67% of virtual enrollments occurred in the core subject areas

The subject area with the highest number of enrollments last year was English Language Arts, accounting for 19 percent of total enrollments. The pass rate for ELA courses statewide was 52 percent last year.Next came a three-way tie between Social Sciences and History, Mathematics, and Life and Physical Sciences, each accounting for just over 10 percent of all online enrollments statewide. Last year, the virtual pass rates for these subject areas were as follows:

  • Social Sciences and History = 56 percent
  • Mathematics = 49 percent
  • Life and Physical Sciences = 53 percent

There is room for improvement, it seems, in the way core subjects are being presented to online learners in our state.

Who’s succeeding in their online courses? Who isn’t?

Pass rates for virtual learning become particularly revealing when we investigate which students are succeeding and which students are not.

We know, for example, that 27 percent of the schools offering online courses had a pass rate of 90-100 percent. For these schools, online learning seems to be working fairly well.

27% of schools had a school-wide virtual pass rate of 90% to 100%

Last year, over half of Michigan schools offering online courses had pass rates of 70 percent or higher. But, of course, the glass is half-full or half-empty depending on how you look at it. The other half of our schools had pass rates below 70 percent.

It’s no surprise that there is a disparity between the top-performing and lowest-performing schools in our state. Online learning is not free from the trends that haunt our education system.

Alternative Education Students Need Additional Support

We also see a disparity in the pass rates for students who take online courses with a general education emphasis and those who take online courses with an alternative education emphasis.

62% pass rate for schools with a general education emphasis. 44% pass rate for schools with an alternative education emphasis

Perhaps what this disparity reveals is that online learning does not work as a last chance option for struggling students unless there are appropriate support systems in place to help these students succeed.

In the 2016-17 school year, we began piloting our Essentials courses for students in alternative education programs and those seeking credit recovery. In designing these courses, we quickly realized that these students needed additional support to succeed.

So far —  by providing comprehensive student orientation modules, free mentor training and highly-qualified online instructors — we’ve seen improved student success rates. Our overall pass rate for the 58 students who took our Essentials pilot in Summer 2017 was 69 percent.

We find these numbers promising, and we hope to continue to improve these courses to better meet the needs of the students who most need our help.

Online Learning is Failing Students in Poverty

Another significant area for improvement in online learning lies in the success rates of students living in poverty. Despite the fact that well over half (62 percent) of our virtual enrollments came from students in poverty, we see a gap of nearly 20 percentage points between the pass rates for students in poverty (48 percent) and students not in poverty (66 percent).

Students in poverty account for 54% of virtual students and 62% of virtual enrollments. Students in poverty have a 48 percent pass rate while students not in poverty had a 66 percent pass rate.

The promise and potential of online learning has always been that it can help any student, anywhere. But clearly, we’re failing students in poverty, and this presents a huge area of growth for leaders in online learning to examine.

Of course, poverty is a complex societal issue that warrants problem-solving from multiple vantage points. But one thing is clear: when transitioning students into online environments, we can do better to provide students living in poverty with the resources they need to succeed.

Less is More When It Comes to Online Learning

We also see discrepancies in success rates based on the type of online program in which students enroll. We see the lowest pass rates (49 percent) among students in full-time cyber schools.

Virtual Enrollments By Type. 57% of virtual enrollments come from part-time (not Michigan Virtual Schools). 38 percent of virtual enrollments come from full-time virtual schools (including cybers), and 4 percent come from part-time Michigan Virtual courses. While full-time online schools have an average pass rate of 49 percent, part-time (not Michigan Virtual schools) have a pass rate of 57 percent. Michigan Virtual part-time students have a pass rate of 81 percent.

Among part-time online programs (excluding Michigan Virtual), we found an average pass rate of 57 percent. Though part-time online programs using Michigan Virtual courses made up only 4 percent of the total virtual enrollments in the state of Michigan, we are proud to have reached an overall pass rate of 81 percent for these courses.

One lesson we can take away from these findings is that less is more when it comes to virtual learning. While about half of virtual learners passed every single one of their online courses, one-quarter did not pass any of their online courses.

Breaking this down, we see a negative correlation between the number of online courses in which a student enrolls and their success rate. Out of the over 25,000 students who did not pass any of their virtual courses, 11,500 enrolled in one or two online courses, 9,500 enrolled in five or more online classes and 2,700 enrolled in 11 or more online courses.

48 percent of virtual learners passed all of their virtual courses. 1/4 of virtual learners did not pass any of their virtual courses. Of the 25,023 students who did not pass any of their virtual courses, 46 percent took only one or two courses, 9,500 took and did not pass five or more virtual courses, and 2,700 took and did not pass 11 or more virtual courses.In fact, as the number of online classes in which a student enrolls increase, their pass rates tend to decrease. Students who took 1-2 virtual classes last year had a 73 percent pass rate while students taking 5+ virtual courses had a 51 percent pass rate.

There is a 73 percent pass rate for students taking 1-2 virtual courses, and a 51 percent pass rate for students taking 5+ virtual courses.We have to remember that online learning provides a very different learning environment compared to face-to-face classrooms. Our students typically have 8-12 years of practice learning in face-to-face settings and, typically, less than 8-12 hours of training in how to learn online before they are expected to succeed in this new medium.

Additional support is particularly necessary for students who are already struggling in their face-to-face classrooms. The odds are, if a student is performing well in their traditional classes, they are much more likely to succeed in their online courses.

For too many students, online learning becomes a last chance for success in a system that has already failed them. There is potential to utilize online and blended learning for revolutionary outcomes, but only if we provide students with the necessary support systems. Otherwise, are we really helping them at all?

Overall, this data should motivate educational leaders to hold critical conversations about what’s going on in online programs in the state of Michigan. If you’d like to read the full version of our Michigan’s K-12 Virtual Learning Effectiveness Report, 2016-17, you can download it here:

Download the Full Report

If you are looking to improve the effectiveness of your school’s online program, we also offer a series of free guides on best practices in online learning for students, parents, mentors, teachers and school boards. Explore our free collection at the link below:

Explore Our Free Best Practice Guides

In order to move forward the needle of student achievement for online learners, our Institute has also begun offering free online program reviews to Michigan K-12 schools that identify strengths and opportunities for growth in their online learning programs. Specifically, these free reviews look at six key aspects of successful online learning programs:

  • Content Procurement and Monitoring Practices
  • Instructor Training and/or Communication
  • Mentor Training and Student Support Techniques
  • Student Selection Processes
  • Parent Communication
  • Overall Program Evaluation

These reviews are available at no charge to Michigan K-12 schools and are conducted by trained researchers from the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute.

Sign up for a free online program review

Picture of Nikki Herta

Nikki Herta

Nikki’s love for writing, editing and pedagogy brought her to Michigan Virtual as their Content Creator/Editor. A Michigan native, she studied writing at Grand Valley State University before continuing on to the University of Minnesota for her master’s degree. While there, she also taught first-year writing to college freshman. Outside of work, she enjoys hiking, playing table-top board games, and curling up in front of the fireplace with a good book and her sassy, ancient cat, Princess Eugene.

The Digital Backpack

Get our latest articles sent straight to your inbox every week!